Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Hellz yeahFollow

#27 Feb 15 2011 at 10:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Overlord Norellicus wrote:
So you can own more than one Alchemist's Stone, you just can't equip more than one simultaneously, right?


Correct. My feral set uses the +stam one, and my resto set uses the +int one. Smiley: grin
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#28 Feb 15 2011 at 10:54 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I like how I'm following topics in the Druid forum that are discussing stat thresholds and such (which I have little knowledge of, or reason to know). And it's for no other reason than that I'm often bored and the Druid forum is super active. XD
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#29 Feb 15 2011 at 10:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
That just means you need to roll a Druid. Smiley: thumbsup
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#30 Feb 15 2011 at 11:09 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Maybe I'll make a Worgen one. :P

I still think I'd find the boomkin hard to look at for long periods of time though...
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#31 Feb 15 2011 at 11:12 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I really miss being in tree form all the time. I like the functionality of the new tree and how it all works, but I'm a druid, being in caster form is wrong.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#32 Feb 15 2011 at 11:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
/agree

I haven't had a chance to use my "/e grows an apple" macro for a while. That used to be a good way to kill time while waiting for groups to assemble.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#33 Feb 15 2011 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
The thing I don't get is why they didn't just let you use balance spells in tree form. I mean, the main reasoning was that Druids in ToL form were too restricted from the rest of their spells, right? Combined with the fact that you had to be in ToL to heal as effectively as other healers?

Would it really have been OP to just remove the spell restrictions? Hell, they could have said something like "Balance spells will suffer from 15% reduced damage." Adjust armor accordingly.

Though I suppose a good part of this was probably the fact that the devs were tired of designing unique sets of gear that no one ever saw if they could avoid it...

All the more reason to show the gear on forms! :D
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#34 Feb 15 2011 at 3:34 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Horsemouth wrote:
I only use two stam cause one is the JC with a dodge clicky, otherwise I would of farmed Tia's. Even normal Tia's would be better than the green stam one.

Armor is still awesome. Armor is still sexier than Mastery. Armor always works, it is beautiful.

edit: you need better tank trinkets as the Alchy one + your mystery mastery trinket aren't to spectacular :P


Alchemy one gives me 440 stamina. That alone is enough for me to not give it up. I don't care what agility gives me in terms of dodge, RNG and I have unfinished business, and baby, I ain't kidding (bonus points for reference).

The mystery trinket I was talking about, but not linking, is Za'brox's Lucky Tooth. I know Mastery isn't all that hot for Druids compared to dodge and stuff (which is why I reforged the mastery on my alchemy trinket to dodge), but it's better than 3k armor just before dying. Macroing the tooth into my Barkskin, I can toss in some extra mitigation every other pull.

Yes, avoidance > health in raids once you have enough health to not die in the time it takes for a healer to cast a heal, but in heroics and such, health is king. Increased Vengeance cap (and thus size of SD procs) and a bigger buffer for when the healer has an aneurysm.

Armor, in my opinion, comes after health in sexiness. Again, this is partly due to RNG hating me. Armor provides constant mitigation whereas dodge is hit or miss. Armor, however, doesn't mitigate magical damage. Neither does health, of course, but it gives the healer more wiggling room to hit panic buttons and such.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#35 Feb 15 2011 at 5:11 PM Rating: Good
idiggory wrote:


Though I suppose a good part of this was probably the fact that the devs were tired of designing unique sets of gear that no one ever saw if they could avoid it...

All the more reason to show the gear on forms! :D


No, just no. I just pictured my Moonkin wearing clothes, and it looks ridiculous.
#36 Feb 15 2011 at 5:54 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I just imagined my Druid with his gear visible in Bear Form.

Wasn't pretty.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#37 Feb 15 2011 at 8:30 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Lol, I didn't envision it in a whole body scenario. :P More like you'd have a few pieces of armor (or some other decoration) that would change with your gear. Hell, just give ferals bracers... (though that wouldn't work for Worgen Bears...)

Probably won't happen though, because it's extra design work.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#38 Feb 15 2011 at 8:43 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I'm still waiting for the Travel Form model to be released. Placeholder model for seven years is fail.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#39 Feb 15 2011 at 9:48 PM Rating: Good
Travel form doesn't really bother me tbh. It makes sense for the travel form to be a cheetah. And it's not like we spend a lot of time in travel form. I'd much rather have them change the boomkin form.
#40 Feb 15 2011 at 9:59 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Boomkin should be the first priority. But I'd very much like updated travel/aquatic forms, too.

Even if they keep the cheetah, I'd like one that's more in keeping with current graphics. I would very much like for the sea lion to disappear and never come back. Give me a dolphin or something. Anything less stupid.

Of course, before they address Druid forms, I would really, really like them to update the old race models. Compare Goblins and Humans. The latter looks TERRIBLE next to them. They can keep the same hair styles and such, if they want, but at least do to the old races what they did to Jaina.

____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#41 Feb 15 2011 at 10:21 PM Rating: Good
Yeah a dolphin would be pretty awesome. I also definitely agree with updating the older races. And I for one would like more hair style options for the Tauren. It really irks me that there's only 4 or 5 hair styles to choose from, and they only added 1 or 2 that you can get from the barber shop.
#42 Feb 15 2011 at 10:56 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
The lack of Worgen male options really surprised me. Females have a TON of options.

I think my issue is three-part:

1. We can't choose hair color. I get why--it's the same reason Tauren can't. But there are only 4 color options, and the mane barely changes between them. I would have liked the option to choose your mane color (and I'm not demanding the ability to have a pink one, but it would nice to be able to choose to be a white Worgen with a light gray mane, or black/brown/gray, etc. Or a black worgen with a light mane. etc.

2. There's a lot of fur in our manes. It would be nice to have some options for it. I'm not demanding styles, per se. But maybe the ability to make it sleeker, or spikier. MAYBE add in a few ponytails down the sides of it, for the hair styles with them or something.

3. Our ears are chosen based on our beard. My model viewer tells me that there are 22 variations and I'd estimate a third of them are beardless (and I think all can be ears can be chosen with a beard, but not all ears with a beard can be chosen without). My issue is the lack of beard variety in terms of color. I HATE the white tuft there. I don't understand why every beard (save one) is white. I wish your beard color was chosen by mane color.

Some stats (via model viewer, so note that they may not be perfect):
Option...Male #...Female #
Fur color...4...12
Face options...9...27 (I imagine this is wrong--I think it may be doubling it by treating DKs as separate)
Hair color...0...4
Hair style...11...20
Ears(/beard)...22...0 (comination of ears and beard/no-beard)

It just seems ridiculous how much more customizable the females are. Especially considering allowing males to choose mane colors would be easy and add a lot of variety.

[EDIT]

The whole "adding hair styles to other races" thing really, really irritated me. Not because they were recycling artwork or because it was like putting actual updates on hold. It irritated me because they clearly made pretty much no attempt to readjust them for the other races. Seriously, all human males with the new options look RIDICULOUS. The hair lines are god awful for all of them. For example, humans got blood elf styles. Blood elf heads are quite a bit thinner than human heads, and smaller. So, the hair style that looks like Varian's hair creates a V at their hair line. On human males, however, it's a straight line, which is super awkward. Furthermore, the hair still has BE proportions, so their heads seem to be flat on top, and the hair often levitates in mid air, or plumetts inside them even when they are idle.

Grrr, it drives me insane when I see them. And now NPCs are getting those hair cuts. >:(

Edited, Feb 16th 2011 12:05am by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#43 Feb 16 2011 at 3:57 AM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
Mazra wrote:
I'm still waiting for the Travel Form model to be released. Placeholder model for seven years is fail.


They should at least change the spell icon from a stag hoof to a cheetah paw or something. That is what makes it really annoying.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#44 Feb 16 2011 at 12:09 PM Rating: Excellent
**
970 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Overlord Norellicus wrote:
So you can own more than one Alchemist's Stone, you just can't equip more than one simultaneously, right?


Correct. My feral set uses the +stam one, and my resto set uses the +int one. Smiley: grin

Since gearswap addons (at least Outfitter) still equip/unequip one slot at a time, I've found that you have to have the alchemist's stones in the same gear slot across specs in order not to break your automation.
#45 Feb 16 2011 at 12:27 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
They should at least change the spell icon from a stag hoof to a cheetah paw or something. That is what makes it really annoying.


Or just give us a stag. The cheetah thing has always annoyed me because cheetahs are burst runners...
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#46 Feb 16 2011 at 1:46 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
idiggory wrote:
Quote:
They should at least change the spell icon from a stag hoof to a cheetah paw or something. That is what makes it really annoying.


Or just give us a stag. The cheetah thing has always annoyed me because cheetahs are burst runners...


This.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#47 Feb 16 2011 at 2:51 PM Rating: Good
True, but I don't think stags are known for running super fast. Not in comparison to cheetahs in any case.
#48 Feb 16 2011 at 3:11 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Stags can apparently bound at up to 40 mph for long periods. O.o;; Aerobic bastards...

Oh, some other random facts. Using WoW's yards as a guide, 310% mounts move at around 58 mph.

That means our normal running speed is around 14 mph (which is tremendous when you consider that would be our long-term running speed. The current best mph for marathons is something like 12.8 mph for men.

So the travel form runs at just under 18 mph.

I don't see why it even has to be a cheetah at such a low point.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#49 Feb 16 2011 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Well I wasn't saying that our travel form is = in relative speed to a cheetah. Hell, after people hit 20 and get their mount the only time travel form is used is in oh **** scenarios while soloing, and popping out of CC during pvp or dungeons/raids. Just that I think when most people think of a speedy animal, they're going to think of a cheetah before a stag. Sounds like a stag form would be more appropriate though.
#50 Feb 16 2011 at 4:48 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
They should change Travel Form to a mount form, like Flight Form.

Paladins, Warlocks and Death Knights get special mounts (Worgen too), so I don't see why not. Just remove the castable in combat functionality and make it our mount.

40% movement speed just doesn't feel like a lot when you're moving at 30% in Cat Form as a Feral anyway, and Flight Form moves at 310% (plus perks?) speed. Switching from Cat Form to Travel Form, I barely noticed a difference. And you get the form at level, what, 16? Way after most Ferals have picked up Feral Swiftness anyway.

Roll the 30% movement speed into Cat Form since Ferals pick up the speed talent anyway and Restos/Boomies would be without a mobility form if not. That way we still have Cat Form which moves us around at 30% speed, plus we have an instant cast land mount that isn't useless for Ferals.

I'd give a lot to be able to instantly transform into a stag and run around at mount speed through Ashenvale...
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#51 Feb 16 2011 at 8:20 PM Rating: Good
Heh, that would be pretty funny! People out there leveling and trying to kill stags for quests would get very confused.

It would be really cool if they'd make travel form the same speed as mounts, I just don't see it happening. Paladins and Warlocks would ***** about it, and want a special flying mount or something. Other people would probably ***** too.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 235 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (235)