Borsuk wrote:
1. You can debate without sounding like a ****.
2. You didn’t realize what he was saying. His argument is that certain classes have specific HP because of their mitigation. (For example – He’s saying a Paladin has the highest mitigation and thus, to be fair, they have the lowest HP.)
3. You missed a previous debate (In the Pally forum) regarding the problems balancing the Pally “ranged†slot and the Warrior “range†slot and how the multipliers were likely made to bring the two classes closer together in terms of “tank-ability†(Though, to be fair it was in the Pally board and they nearly all agreed that Pallys had it better – haha…)
4. On your mighty 4th post – try to be less hostile and more friendly.
1: Grow some thicker skin, if his post was sounding like a **** I don't want to know how you classify half my posts.
2: Life isn't fair, protadins have the highest HP after druids.
They also currently have the best mitigation out of all tank classes and in general are the best tanks for just about anything anywhere right now.
At least, from what I know about it. (which, admittedly, isn't a whole lot)
3: Can you blame him, or anyone else in here, for missing a discussion on the paladin forums?
4: Sure looks like a hostile comment to me, I dare say it makes you sound like a ****. Or a hypocrite, pick your favourite.