Moonkissed wrote:
xNocturnalSunx wrote:
I say, if a healer does their job and keeps whomever they're supposed to be watching, alive. Then they're doing a good job.
This is the only thing you need to know for healing. People who get into a competition over how much they heal are wasting their time. Focus on keeping Tanks(firstly) and DPS(secondly) alive and free of negative effects. If you can do that... you have succeeded.
Yes and no.
On one hand, what Nocturnal and Moonkissed are saying is true. What matters is whether or not people are regularly dying (within bounds of what a healer is capable of preventing) and, ultimately, whether or not the raid succeeds.
However, a healing meter is a valuable tool that you can use to assess your performance relative to others. When a Resto Druid averages ~50% of the heals on Hodir, I
curse him, yea unto seven generations try to look for more ways to contribute. When a Priest and I combine to split 50% of the total healing in a 25-man Naxx, we call people out.
Undeadsinner wrote:
Is it common for a shaman healer to take top heals in a 25 man naxx run? The raid i was in last night the shaman healer was 1mil heals over #2 at the end of 2 quarters. There where 3 pally healers and a priest healer. Just like to know if the shaman healer could realy pull heals like that or was the other just off.
There are a lot of x-factors in this game that make this a very subjective answer. You could have had an excellent Shaman healer, or the other healers could have been slackers. It would also depend on the content at hand. Naxx is a playground for Resto Shaman where the raid damage is generally constant without being overbearing. Ulduar, on the other hand, is more touch and go and
heavily favors Holy Priests and Resto Druids.