Archfiend Goggy wrote:
AureliusSir wrote:
It only matters because some (see also: most) of the people here responded with why they didn't really feel that the recoil from SoB/SotM was that big of an issue and your response was to start up with the namecalling and other associated idiocy.
To be honest they got called @#%^tards because I got tired of trying to explain that this wasn't my explicit request for a change to the SotM to the people here, it was posting about another thread and asking people whether they wanted to join in that subject. I grew tired then, I grow tired, now. Once again you have proven yourself to be a complete @#%^ moron and have failed to read back over the 2 pages of diatribe and understand, I couldn't give a tuppeny@#%^ whether you agree, but don't point the finger at me, if you do then I come back at you. Sometimes you need to be told you're an obtuse toss pot, irrespective of better words.
No you didn't, ya blithering ninny.
You posted here to draw attention to a thread on the o-boards. The topic of that thread was the recoil from SoB/SotM. People reading that thread didn't agree with its premise for one reason or another. They posted why here. You had a temper tantrum and started calling people down for their opinions because they are contrary to yours.
Quote:
It was never about my DPS score,
Really? Then why did you post this:
Goggy the Braindead wrote:
Furthermore, using SotM/SoB does not put us on a par with those classes you mentioned. Using those seals usually has us hovering around mid-table.
and
Goggy the Self-Contradicting wrote:
The whole point is, which people seem to be struggling to grasp, is that to do that damage you have to take damage yourself. In Naxx 25 I do 3.2k-3.5k DPS, I generally sit mid table. The issue is not whether I am top of the DPS, it is that fact that to be mid-table I have to take damage because I need to use SotM/SoB. No other class has to do this.
So in other words, you're choked that the best you can muster is "mid-table" dps (aka: QQ need moar dps pl0x) and part of that dps comes at the expense of a trivial amount of health (excluding gimmicks).
Riiiiiiight.
Quote:
Again you referring to JoL. Furthermore before you go on about an alternating pattern between JoL & JoW, you could, but then neither are going to award enough to substantially increase a depleting stat. Again your @#%^tardery soaks through. You hold yourself in some great elevated position as an authority on paladins. Why do I need to prove to you recoil damage from SoB? If you were worth any of the high position you're putting yourself in a simple mathematical calculation on any of the front page WWS stats will show you recoil (holy) damage can exceed or be below that stat, depending on crits and other factors. Also as you have chosen to trivialise the damage, it's not as if the damage is in isolation, as no fights are. There is the attack damage and AOE to contend with.
If you've got a prot paladin or a holy paladin in your group and you're judging Wisdom, you're a ******* ******. Period. JoL is the primary choice for ret paladins who actually have a clue. Prot paladins
used to lay claim to JoL because there was a little omission in the code that let us generate threat from the passive healing provided by people attacking the targets we judged. That bonus threat was taken away and now it's typically considered standard procedure to let the ret pally judge Light because they produce the most healing from it. Other people have said so in this thread. Of course, you only beak off, you don't read. Now you know. So get over your ignorant self, close your mouth, open your mind, and learn.
Quote:
Don't be so stupid? You don't be so stupid, you're contradicting yourself at every step. Don't use SoB? It's our primary stat for DPS, you consider me rude, well you make me rude because it's frustratingly like talking to an immature child, who'll use every word in his limited dictionary to try and be clever. Rude? Maybe, but I'd rather tell you to go @#%^ yourself than pretend that I'm happy to answer a post, yet again, incorrectly missing the point. What you read is what you get.
Here, allow me to bold and capitalize it for emphasis for you since you appear to be glossing over it:
IF JUDGING SOB/SOTM WITH A GIMMICK DAMAGE BUFF IS GOING TO PRODUCE A RECOIL THAT IS GOING TO CAUSE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF DAMAGE, DON'T JUDGE SOB/SOTM. RE-SEAL SOMETHING ELSE UNTIL THE BUFF IS GONE OR YOU'VE GOT THE HEALTH TO SUSTAIN THE RECOIL. Also known as: think for yourself, be dynamic (as opposed to a lazy twunt) and adjust your approach to suit the situation instead of expecting Blizzard to adjust the situation to suit you.
Savvy?
Quote:
It's disrespecting a handful of people who've bothered to respond to this thread, and why? Because the majority of that handful have repeatedly failed to grasp the crux of this message. I have a lot of respect for a lot of people here, I don't weigh all my eggs into this message then go and look at other message you or others have written and dismiss them. Same as if people are rating down a thread, I read what the person is saying first before making a decision if it is bollox or not. Why am I here? Am I supposed to take that as a serious question because a few people in this thread can't grasp what it is about and continue posting utter rubbish.
Oh no, they've grasped the crux of the message. They've responded here regarding why they don't support the crux of the OP's message in the o-boards thread. What is it about that that you're having a hard time understanding? I'm sorry...you may be willing to debase yourself to participate in o-boards idiocy, but I'm not. I'm not wasting the time to log in and cast my lot with that churning mass of adolescent retardation. You brought up the topic here, people are responding to it here. If you don't want people to respond here,
don't start threads here. Just because you don't want it discussed here doesn't reflect in any way on the intelligence of anyone responding here. It's not your ******* forum, and it couldn't be made more clear to you that neither your attitude nor your "expertise" is welcome here, so knock it off or **** off. Either that, or expect to get ripped into when you post like a moron.
Quote:
That's because there responses focused on me, and yet again I write, this is not about me, but those people continued to yadder on about the OT and me as if I was soley requesting that this thread in Alla could affect SoB, who's the more foolish? Maybe those people could be smarter if they acknowledged that they grasped the wrong end of the stick. Again I make no aplogies for the language used, I'm personally @#%^ed off with a small minority of people here who completely and utterly fail at reading, English and debate. If people post with asshat comments then they're going to get my tongue lashed back at them, if the best they can do is hit the rate down button, good for them. If that small pathetic victory brings some respite to their sad little lives then I've helped in some way.
It
is about you, because you didn't just bring the thread to the attention of these boards, you commented with your opinion on them, and when you're the OP of the thread, whether you intended it/want it or not, you are inviting feedback on your opinions. It just turns out in this case that your opinion is neither based in fact, and your supporting arguments are not more than namecalling and lame defenses for your namecalling. You're an idiot. It's just that simple.
Quote:
To be honest nearly every person apart from the 5 or 6 that have posted in here, you included, reference EJ as a source for good advice on a variety of WoW mechanics. Who's in the minority?
The difference is that they can site
why the information the gleaned from EJ is valid. They back up the validity of the data with logic. You back it up based on the source. Enormous, enormous difference. You've yet to offer a cogent argument to anything you've posted here. You duck, dodge, and call names. You're useless.
Quote:
Actually I have a very open mind, as has been shown repeatedly when I have written over and over again that people may not agree. The only time I have gotten defensive is when people have suggested that it is a QQ from me about SoB.
No. People have said the complaints
in general about SoB/SotM are QQ. You connect that (like a moron) as though it's a personal attack on you and go flailing and wailing in an attempt to defend yourself against
the heinous personal assault that is generalized commentary because you're too stupid to distinguish the two.
Quote:
Try to be less of a patronising cnut, especially when you're wrong, it makes you look like a ****.
Take your own advice much?
Quote:
OMG I lost karma, over a subject. What the @#%^ do you want me to write about that? Oh my god I should ditch any personal opinion I have about a subject and conform to what a small group on Alla say in case they mark me down? I'd rather have my principles than worry about whether you were going to mark me down anyday.
No, you should keep your opinion for so long as you can back it up with fact and ditch your ****-poor attitude. See how that works? You can hold any number of varied opinions, but when your first response to someone who challenges that opinion in any way is to immediately (see also:
immediately) start namecalling like a butthurt 9 yr old, you're going to suffer in your reputation with the community. I just found it was amusing that you claimed you had done something that you're incapable of doing. You're just full of all manner of misinformation and ignorance, aren't you?
[quote]Mate, you're a weasel. I've met some 'limp wristed' plonkers in my time, but you take the biscuit. I can live without karma, as I said, if people take some small victory from marking a subject down because they're jumped on some ill-informed bandwagon then good for them. Karma neither makes a subject right or wrong, try to remember that before you use it as a measure for some for of righteousness.
[/quote]
Sort of like you claiming to rate someone down for using the expression, "QQ"?
******* hypocrite.
Final tip: OT means
off topic, not whatever the hell you think it means.