Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

A few words on Vigilance from a paladin tankFollow

#1 Feb 06 2009 at 9:06 PM Rating: Good
This could easily degrade into a rant because the urge to rant is what prompted me to make this post, so let me preface by saying I'm not leveling accusations at a class/spec in general.

Vigilance is an awesome tanking tool that was given to Protection warriors. It brings them on par with a paladin's Righteous Defense and in certain circumstances can be way better. An attentive warrior throwing Vigilance on a healer can avert a wipe. A savvy warrior putting Vigilance on a high dps party/raid member can not only boost the maximum dps potential of that player, but can benefit a bit in their own threat generation every time the dps damages a target.

In certain situations, putting Vigilance on another tank in a raid can be a brilliant strategy. Warrior tanking whelps/elementals in OS, slimes during the Grobbulus fight, or any other situation where a warrior might be required to pick up multiple mobs from a variety of places on the game field make Vigilance a neat ability to have access to. A pair of warrior tanks in a raid putting Vigilance on each other is an awesome way to ensure that no mob strays for more than a second or two at any time.

Here's the kicker, however: Vigilance on another tank is a debuff on that tank, so it stands to reason that it should be used selectively and in cooperation with that tank. Putting Vigilance on another tank in a raid without mentioning it to them is poor, poor etiquette. Putting Vigilance on another tank in a raid and then using it as part of an overall strategy to flex your e-peen and taunt a whole group of mobs onto you while the other tank stands there wondering wtf happened is weak. Very weak.

Apparently, there are a lot of warriors in raids these days that see it as their entitlement to put Vigilance on whomever they want whenever they want because hey, why not? The trouble is that Vigilance, while a benefit in some situations, is not more than a crutch in others. If you're a protection warrior and can't for the life of you figure out how you would manage without Vigilance on another tank at all times, I'd like to respectfully suggest you read a bit more about protection warriors, their roles in groups, and how to best go about filling those roles. Right now, Naxx is pretty cake-like in terms of potential tank threat vs. threat generated by your run of the mill dps class. We don't know what we're going to find in Ulduar, so it makes sense that nobody...regardless of class or spec...become too accustomed to abusing certain abilities as crutches.
#2 Feb 06 2009 at 10:39 PM Rating: Decent
**
501 posts
Cool story, bro.
#3 Feb 08 2009 at 10:32 AM Rating: Decent
*
233 posts
/agree

As an aside, does anyone know if the damage reduction from Vigilance works in pvp. In BGs I always throw it onto a random party member, thinking that they might get a little damage reduction, but I don't actually know if it does. Can anyone confirm/deny this?
#4 Feb 09 2009 at 5:23 AM Rating: Default
I cant imagine puting vigilence on another tank...

case 1: the warrior tank see's your threat climbing in omen ,doesnt know that your a tank as well (PUGs)
case 2: The warrior is stupid...

Vigilence is for healers/high threat dps

If your a tank and see vigilence on you SCREAM....
#5 Feb 09 2009 at 10:31 AM Rating: Excellent
**
501 posts
Yes, in most cases it SHOULD be on your highest DPS, or in cases of very close DPS, one that does not have a threat drop (read: fury warrior). However, there are situational uses where it is useful on other tanks. Patch is a good example of this. There is no possible way DPS is going to pull threat unless your tanks are fundamentally retarded. A vigilance on an OT really only comes out to 1% damage reduction when all is said and done, but it is STILL a reduction that you may as well have. A warrior tanking adds on Sarth 3D should be putting vigilance on the Sarth tank because threat is not a consideration and it provides them with endless taunts for adds. Though it isn't an issue now because the DPS is there to simply burn them before marks stack, even in 10 man, when I did Naxx10 for the first time my OT and I would Vigilance each other to ensure that a resisted taunt didn't cause problems, as it would be instantly refreshed. Just like every other ability, it has a time and place to be used.

This thread is still pointless however, and is akin to me going over to the Paladin boards and making a post about paladin tanks getting butt sore when I out TPS them on trash and use their multi-mob taunt on me. Bad players will continue to be bad, it's not news. It didn't require this rant, and I sincerely doubt any of us really care. This post has as much relevance as someone ******** about their bad PUG experience. If you don't want the Vigilance on you, click the damn thing off like I do when I have bad tanks in 10s I PUG put it on me at the wrong time. I will say once more, as I did originally..

Cool story, bro.
#6 Feb 27 2009 at 7:27 AM Rating: Decent
27 posts
the only time I ever put vigilance on a tank is durring the patchwerk fight. other than that its always on an enchance shammy in my raid.
#7 Feb 27 2009 at 7:33 AM Rating: Good
FletusSanguine wrote:
Yes, in most cases it SHOULD be on your highest DPS, or in cases of very close DPS, one that does not have a threat drop (read: fury warrior).


You're usually better putting it on a Mage or similar; high DPS caster without passive threat reduction, at least in terms of "what will boost my personal threat the most". Hunters work too.

And yes, it's actually a good idea to put it on other tanks in Patchwerk, especially if you don't have BoSanctuary handy.
#8 Mar 01 2009 at 9:39 PM Rating: Good
*
160 posts
Just would like to add....if as a paladin vigilance is put on you and you can't compensate for the threat loss, you fail.

It is common practice for me to put vig on our pally due to primarily AoE dps in the group. While runners are still rare, the dmg reduction and infinite taunts make up for it. All the while he is still MILES above the group on threat.
#9 Mar 01 2009 at 11:29 PM Rating: Decent
thumperbs wrote:
Just would like to add....if as a paladin vigilance is put on you and you can't compensate for the threat loss, you fail.

It is common practice for me to put vig on our pally due to primarily AoE dps in the group. While runners are still rare, the dmg reduction and infinite taunts make up for it. All the while he is still MILES above the group on threat.


Does the DR from Vigilance stack with the DR from BoSanc? I recall reading somewhere that it doesn't. If the pally you're putting Vigilance on is OK with it, by all means put it on.

We had a warrior in our guild who transferred off realm for a couple of months after WotLK to join a top 100 US guild to push the envelope with his skill set and see how things are done in a high performing guild. In his first raid, he put Vigilance on a pally tank...the pally's response was along the lines of, "wtf makes you think I need 10% less threat?" The warrior was almost booted from the raid/guild on his first night for debuffing a raid member without telling them.

It doesn't make a lot of sense to reduce the threat of a tank when you could be reducing the threat of a dps. If you don't reduce the threat of another tank, you're less likely to need infinite taunts.
#10 Mar 02 2009 at 3:51 AM Rating: Excellent
****
8,779 posts
he probably wasnt doing it for the threat, he was probably doing it for the damage reduction.

as to why you would want to take threat from a tank, anytime a warrior is OTing more threat = good. pallies have no problems making threat as an OT but warriors sure do, and no one really has threat issues currently as MT so....why not?

Edited, Mar 2nd 2009 4:00am by Quor
#11 Mar 02 2009 at 3:11 PM Rating: Good
Quor wrote:
he probably wasnt doing it for the threat, he was probably doing it for the damage reduction.

as to why you would want to take threat from a tank, anytime a warrior is OTing more threat = good. pallies have no problems making threat as an OT but warriors sure do, and no one really has threat issues currently as MT so....why not?


It's situational. I agree that it's never a bad thing to have more threat as an OT...what I disagree with is the idea that there's no harm in taking that extra threat from another tank. Tanks want to build threat as quickly as possible. Dps do not. Vigilance on another tank (unless it's another warrior who can have Vigilance on you) does not serve that goal. Vigilance on the dps does.
#13 Apr 27 2009 at 1:43 AM Rating: Good
**
910 posts
The last time I put Vigilance on a tank was during Patchwerk. That's about it. Only when another tank asks for Vigilance, I'll put it on him/her. Other than that, I'll slap it on a melee dps.

During groups, I wouldn't bother putting it on anyone...maybe the healer...or the over-enthusiastic mage.
#14 Apr 27 2009 at 5:12 AM Rating: Good
***
1,622 posts
Mylandre wrote:
The last time I put Vigilance on a tank was during Patchwerk. That's about it. Only when another tank asks for Vigilance, I'll put it on him/her. Other than that, I'll slap it on a melee dps.

FletusSanguine wrote:
A warrior tanking adds on Sarth 3D should be putting vigilance on the Sarth tank because threat is not a consideration and it provides them with endless taunts for adds. Though it isn't an issue now because the DPS is there to simply burn them before marks stack, even in 10 man, when I did Naxx10 for the first time my OT and I would Vigilance each other to ensure that a resisted taunt didn't cause problems, as it would be instantly refreshed. Just like every other ability, it has a time and place to be used.

I agree you shouldn't just drop Vigilance on another tank just so that you can endlessly taunt mobs off of them and prove what a "great tank" you are.

In practice, Vigilance is probably underutilized though, and there are a lot of situations it "could" be very useful for.
#15REDACTED, Posted: Mar 16 2010 at 9:05 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Vigilance on MT for Lich King = win (for the refreshed taunt cd) Best to not apply it until p5 (which the tank will have insane amounts of threat at that time anyway) then your free to taunt every vile spirit u can. Other than that i just throw on a healer most likely to die since u can war tank a pack of 5 mobs with your eyes closed and hold threat
#16 Mar 19 2010 at 4:56 PM Rating: Default
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
You're usually better putting it on a Mage or similar; high DPS caster without passive threat reduction, at least in terms of "what will boost my personal threat the most". Hunters work too.


My Mage ADORES Vigilance. It is extremely rare for me to get out-DpSed in a Heroic (Did 9K DpS on a boss last night, overall, which was awesome--gotta love extremely lucky crits). But, while my single-target threat only produces 85% Threat (could be 70%), and I do have a threat drop and a threat-extender (for lack of a better word), both are often useless on Trash because A. I'll die before Invis even goes off usually or B. I'm completely wasting an awesome CD.

The unfortunate part is that all my AoE does 1x threat. And I can put out a looooot of it. Vigilance has, quite literally, saved my life quite a few times, either from the reduction or preventing me pulling threat in the first place.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#17 Mar 20 2010 at 5:42 AM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
I tank Jaxx, I get Vig.

PROFIT.

Seriously Vig is a tool.

Treat it as such.

edit: Listen to Uncle Quor. He knows whats best.

Edited, Mar 20th 2010 7:45am by Horsemouth
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#18 Mar 20 2010 at 8:32 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I love putting it on a Ret Paladin.

When they pull aggro through their passive 30% threat modifier, their 20% Hand of Salvation and Vigilance's 10%, I can laugh them in the face as they eat dirt, without feeling the slightest bit guilty.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#19 Apr 06 2010 at 7:05 AM Rating: Good
flotprot wrote:
Vigilance on MT for Lich King = win (for the refreshed taunt cd) Best to not apply it until p5 (which the tank will have insane amounts of threat at that time anyway) then your free to taunt every vile spirit u can. Other than that i just throw on a healer most likely to die since u can war tank a pack of 5 mobs with your eyes closed and hold threat

Edited, Mar 16th 2010 10:06am by flotprot

Edited, Mar 16th 2010 10:07am by flotprot


This post wasn't a year old when you bumped it or anything.
#20 Apr 06 2010 at 6:27 PM Rating: Good
**
584 posts
Quote:
This post wasn't a year old when you bumped it or anything.


Out of curiosity, has Flotprot actually posted in any threads that he hasn't brought back from the dead?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 184 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (184)