Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Maxdps added unholy death knightsFollow

#27 Jan 30 2009 at 7:26 AM Rating: Excellent
**
676 posts
Galenmoon wrote:
Good luck with that
#28 Jan 30 2009 at 10:39 AM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
SirMattelot wrote:
Quote:
Matt, at this point, most of the new people who might come to this forum to seek advice, won't know enough to turn off the filter to see your posts. And even if they did, they probably wouldn't take the advice of someone who is sub-defaulted.


Which is why the system here is so ridiculously flawed. I see many people with Guru or Sage titles who are as dumb as it gets. If they take my advice, that's fine, if not, that's fine too.


The system is not flawed, at least not to the extent you make it sound. There is abuse now and then but honestly the system works great. Bad advice is rated down and good advice is rated up. All is right in the world. Care to give an example of someone who is guru or sage that is dumb?



SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
So, regardless of your thick skin and seemingly endless patience with "crazy people", the end result seems to have defeated the purpose of you posting here.


Sorry to burst your bubble, but a bunch of idiots will not stop me from posting. Like I said, i'm not one of the many people who're susceptible to trolling.
You are susceptible to trolling. Half your posts prove that. The goal isn't to stop you from posting, sadly there are idiots dumber than you here. The goal is to stop bad advice from reaching new inexperienced players. Sub-Default has done that. Mission accomplished.



SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
I won't argue it one way or the other, but it seems the "crazy people" think you're doing the exact thing to them, that you perceive them doing to you.


Making them all that more crazy. I know better, which is why I laugh and brush them off.
How do you know you're not being trolled?



SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
And making assumptions about the experience level of the posters here comparative to your own probably isn't going to help much when it comes to people actually listening to what you say.


Hypocrisy is fun, isn't it? :)

There's no hippo crisis here. Galenmoon didn't say anything hypocritical.


SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
All I'm saying is getting yourself sub-defaulted for no good reason kinda means no one is gonna read your posts except to reply in some sort of flame... Good luck with that.


If those idiots want to continue to be idiots, let them.
Obviously nothing is stopping you.


Welcome to sub-default. You have a choice from here. You can continue to post crap or you can start posting something useful. It's up to you.
#29REDACTED, Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 12:24 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Woohoo! This coming from the guy who I have yet to see post anything intelligent.
#30 Jan 30 2009 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
SirMattelot wrote:

Which is why the system here is so ridiculously flawed. I see many people with Guru or Sage titles who are as dumb as it gets. If they take my advice, that's fine, if not, that's fine too.


The system is not flawed, at least not to the extent you make it sound. There is abuse now and then but honestly the system works great. Bad advice is rated down and good advice is rated up. All is right in the world. Care to give an example of someone who is guru or sage that is dumb?


Karma System is working as intended.
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#31 Jan 30 2009 at 1:07 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
SirMattelot wrote:
Quote:
The system is not flawed, at least not to the extent you make it sound. There is abuse now and then but honestly the system works great. Bad advice is rated down and good advice is rated up. All is right in the world. Care to give an example of someone who is guru or sage that is dumb?


Survey says? You're wrong


Can you link this survey to back you up? Or you just babbling crap like all your other 'informational' posts?


SirMattelot wrote:

The system is extremely flawed. If you disagree with this, you're either trolling or stupid.

How is it flawed? Again I'm asking you to back up your claims. Something you've never done yet. What's funny is most users who claim it's a bad system are morons like you who post crap.





SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
You are susceptible to trolling. Half your posts prove that. The goal isn't to stop you from posting, sadly there are idiots dumber than you here. The goal is to stop bad advice from reaching new inexperienced players. Sub-Default has done that. Mission accomplished.


Strike 2

For you.



SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
How do you know you're not being trolled?


Because if they are, they're by far the worst trolls i've ever seen.

And yet you still fall for it. Who's dumber? The dumb troll or the dumb trollee?



SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
There's no hippo crisis here. Galenmoon didn't say anything hypocritical.


www.dictionary.com Use it

I know what hippomatumsussess are. I also know what hypocrites are. By all means show me where Galenmoon said something hypocritical. (notice I keep asking you to post your proof?)




SirMattelot wrote:

Quote:
Obviously nothing is stopping you.

Welcome to sub-default. You have a choice from here. You can continue to post crap or you can start posting something useful. It's up to you.


Woohoo! This coming from the guy who I have yet to see post anything intelligent.

Strike 3! You lose


Screenshot


I'll let you ponder that one.


Edited, Jan 30th 2009 4:06pm by MentalFrog
#32REDACTED, Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 1:42 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I don't even need to ponder for a split second to notice that you've yet to post anything intelligent.
#33 Jan 30 2009 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Screenshot
.

Edited, Jan 30th 2009 3:55pm by MentalFrog
#34REDACTED, Posted: Jan 30 2009 at 2:17 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) /popcorn
#35 Jan 30 2009 at 2:40 PM Rating: Excellent
SirMattelot wrote:
trolling and abuse


Keep up the trolling and abuse and I will remove your posting ability period.

edit - on second thought, after reading more of your posts, you're done. Effective immediately. Take your anger and trolling somewhere else. Make a sock and you will get a full ban.

Edited, Jan 30th 2009 2:49pm by Wordaen
#36 Jan 30 2009 at 3:32 PM Rating: Good
Thanks for the site. I've found unholy spec works best for me . . .er, I find it to be the funniest. So any info on how I can go around and cause mass-murder at a better rate is always good.


PS: When you filter this thread, it is funny. When filter is off, it is epic.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#37 Jan 30 2009 at 7:22 PM Rating: Good
**
676 posts
Wordaen, Keeper of the Banstick wrote:
SirMattelot wrote:
trolling and abuse


Keep up the trolling and abuse and I will remove your posting ability period.

edit - on second thought, after reading more of your posts, you're done. Effective immediately. Take your anger and trolling somewhere else. Make a sock and you will get a full ban.


Wordaen FTW!

Back to useful threads!
#38 Jan 31 2009 at 3:17 PM Rating: Decent
You know... if you just let me have your keys, I could have totally saved you the effort and done it myself, Word.
#39 Jan 31 2009 at 4:05 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,048 posts
As fascinating as the trolling has been (which I apparently missed--fiddlesticks Smiley: mad), maxdps isn't a legitimate source of information to really anyone.

If you're at the point where you can effectively use maxdps and know what you're doing, you don't need it in the first place.

As Therion wisely pointed out, just looking at a gear list on wowhead will give you the same results.

If you have no idea what you're doing and trying to find gear, then you're screwed either way and should be looking into spreadsheets, because:

1) Spreadsheets are more reliable and more idiot-proof

2) maxdps isn't wholly accurate in their number calculations

3) their site is a lot harder to work with than it should be

4) they have that ******* annoying Rachel Ray CBS ad on their site.

It's really not an ideal site. I have no idea if there's a DK spreadsheet out yet (à la Vulajin's rogue spreadsheet), but if there is, there shouldn't be any discussion on what to use for DPS calculations.
#40 Jan 31 2009 at 5:23 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,039 posts
finally the return of theo.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 241 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (241)